Are We Overcomplicating Software Development with Too Many Tools? Let's be real, the tech world loves a good shiny new tool. Every week, it feels like there's a new platform, library, or framework promising to revolutionize how we build software. But are we actually making things better, or are we just piling on complexity? I've been there, done that – drowning in a sea of tools, each promising the moon but delivering mostly frustration. You know what I mean? It's like trying to build a house with a thousand different types of hammers. Sure, some are specialized, but do you really need a hammer for every single nail? I think we've reached peak tool overload. It's time to simplify. Not related, but can we talk about how cold it's been lately? Anyway, back to the tools. The problem is that each tool comes with its own learning curve, its own quirks, its own set of dependencies. Suddenly, your simple project requires a whole team of specialists just to manage the tech stack. It's crazy! I was hyped when I first discovered [Tool X], but then I realized it was more trouble than it was worth. And it seriously freaked me out when I had to debug something that spanned across three different frameworks. The overhead of managing all these tools – the configuration, the updates, the potential conflicts – it's a huge drain on resources and time. I know, this is wild — but stay with me. What if we focused on mastering a few core tools really well, instead of chasing every shiny new thing? What if we prioritized simplicity and maintainability over the latest trends? I'm not saying we should reject all new tools. Innovation is important. But maybe we need to be more selective, more discerning. Maybe we need to ask ourselves: "Does this tool actually solve a real problem? Does it improve our workflow, or does it just add another layer of complexity?" Let's strive for elegance, not just features. Have you tried this? Would love to hear your take!